인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.3
- 수록면
- 20 - 32 (13page)
- DOI
- 10.33162/JAR.2024.3.24.1.020
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
Purpose: This study aims to compare and analyze literature and regulations related to Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Cost (RAM-C) in the South Korean and U.S. military contexts, while also exploring the development directions of domestic regulations and procedures.
Methods: The research entails an examination of RAM-C-related procedures and literature used by the Department of Defense in both South Korea and the U.S. To achieve this objective, relevant regulations for both the U.S. military and domestic settings are categorized according to the stages of weapon system development. This study presents these regulations in a comparative framework, highlighting their interconnectedness and discerning any differences.
Results: Differences across eight categories are identified, and six improvement strategies are proposed to address these disparities.
Conclusion: Domestic regulations exhibit fragmentation compared to the regulations of the U.S. military. Following the identification of these issues, potential methods for improving these differences have been proposed.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지Methods: The research entails an examination of RAM-C-related procedures and literature used by the Department of Defense in both South Korea and the U.S. To achieve this objective, relevant regulations for both the U.S. military and domestic settings are categorized according to the stages of weapon system development. This study presents these regulations in a comparative framework, highlighting their interconnectedness and discerning any differences.
Results: Differences across eight categories are identified, and six improvement strategies are proposed to address these disparities.
Conclusion: Domestic regulations exhibit fragmentation compared to the regulations of the U.S. military. Following the identification of these issues, potential methods for improving these differences have been proposed.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 서론
- 2. 미군 신뢰성 기반 비용분석 절차
- 3. 국내 국방 분야 신뢰성 기반 비용관리 관련 업무절차
- 4. 국내 및 미군 규정 비교 분석 및 향후 발전 방향 고찰
- 5. 결론
- References
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
