지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.9
- 수록면
- 361 - 380 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The San Francisco Peace Treaty is constitutive, and some of its provisions have an effect erga omnes (rights or obligations toward all). But its territorial clause does not purport to define Korea`s boundaries in any detail and does not mention Dokdo, a group of some ninety islets in the East Sea, or Sea of Japan, that are contested by Korea and Japan. In determining what course of action should be taken in light of this development, a study of the status and connotation of these words in modern international law must be rooted in an approach to the Korean territorial dispute in contrast to an approach based on a formalistic reading of the peace treaty. The term "historical criticism approach," which appeared in a recent judgment of the International Court of Justice, is an encouraging indicator. International lawyers should be inspired to employ this approach when dealing with territorial issues that involve Korea.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089639185