메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박혜경 (단국대학교)
저널정보
글로벌영어교육학회 Studies in English Education Studies in English Education 제28권 제4호
발행연도
2023.12
수록면
25 - 53 (29page)
DOI
10.22275/SEE.28.4.02

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examines the use of ChatGPT in analyzing grammatical errors in English writing. The purpose is to explore the effectiveness and accuracy of ChatGPT’s error analysis in comparison to human raters. Seventy-seven paragraphs written by Korean university students were analyzed by ChatGPT and two human raters based on fifteen error types. The results showed disparities in error frequencies between ChatGPT and human raters. The only similarity in error frequency identified was that both ChatGPT and human raters marked word choice error as the most frequent. However, ChatGPT detected sentence structure and informal language errors more frequently than human raters. Furthermore, ChatGPT’s analysis on individual students’ error frequency differed from that of human raters. In addition to the quantitative result of error frequency, the researcher conducted a qualitative analysis of ChatGPT’s error analysis. The results demonstrated that ChatGPT sometimes identified errors that did not exist in the students’ original texts and failed to consider the context of the original text. In many instances, ChatGPT exhibited inconsistencies in determining the appropriate error types. The findings of this study suggest that, while ChatGPT represents state-of-the-art technology, educators should be mindful of its strengths and limitations when integrating it into English writing instruction.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0