메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김성희 (장안대학교) 이준우 (호서대학교) 김세형 (충북대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제33권 제3호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2024.6
수록면
698 - 712 (15page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2024.6.33.3.698

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study verified the suitability of park golf course sevicescape measurement scale applying Rasch rating scale model. The 189(men=103; women=86) Korean park golf players were surveyed. Winsteps 5.7.1 and R 4.3.1 programs were used to analyze the data. The results were as follow. First, in the response category suitability analysis, 4-point response category was appropriate for the space arrangement factor, 5-point response category for the course management condition factor, 3-point response category for the location condition factor, and 4-point response category for the surrounding environment condition factor. Second, in the analysis of the suitability of the items, one item (item 5) in the space arrangement factor and one item (item 6) in the course management status factor were inappropriate. Third, in the analysis of the differential item functioning according to gender, one item (item 3) was extracted from the spatial arrangement factor and one item (item 4) was extracted from the location condition factor. Fourth, as a result of verifying the suitability of the respondent"s attributes and the item difficulty distribution for each factor, the items of the three factors (space arrangement factor, location condition factor, and environmental condition factor) excluding the course management condition factor were found to be appropriate for the respondent"s attributes. There was a problem with measurement. Therefore, based on this study, it is necessary to add items related to space arrangement, location conditions, and environmental conditions, and further survey respondents to reexamine suitability.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-151-24-02-090062092