인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Huayan thinkers such as Zhiyan, Ǔisang, and Fazang adopted many skillful means to teach the doctrine of dependent arising of the dharmadhātu, which is based on the thesis of mutual identity and mutual entering. In addition to the well-known similes such as a golden lion’s image and Indra’s net, their treatises introduce another important instructive device called the method of counting ten natural numbers.
But this method of counting ten is presented in an extremely terse manner, causing difficulties in comprehending its overall structure. Suspicions about its usefulness as skillful means (Skt. upāya) or misguided elaboration of this method may be attributed to its lack of detailed guidelines. Therefore, we need to restore the parts omitted in those Huayan thinkers’ explanations. In this respect, commentaries on Fazang’s Wujiao zhang that appeared from the Song period, which saw the revival of Huayan scholasticism, may help to fill the hermeneutical lacuna.
This paper thus tries to reformulate many solutions for revealing the hidden structure of the method in question, presented by the previous Huayan thinkers, as introduced in Hōtan’s Kyōshinshō and Kyunyŏ’s Wŏnt’ong ch’o. From these solutions, we can appreciate those ancient scholar-monks’ intense efforts to secure scholastic integrity and consistency so that this seemingly abstract method of counting ten could be well suited for their religious cultivation. This survey also suggests that we need to note the unnoticed history of intellectual exchanges in the East Asian tradition of Huayan scholasticism.
But this method of counting ten is presented in an extremely terse manner, causing difficulties in comprehending its overall structure. Suspicions about its usefulness as skillful means (Skt. upāya) or misguided elaboration of this method may be attributed to its lack of detailed guidelines. Therefore, we need to restore the parts omitted in those Huayan thinkers’ explanations. In this respect, commentaries on Fazang’s Wujiao zhang that appeared from the Song period, which saw the revival of Huayan scholasticism, may help to fill the hermeneutical lacuna.
This paper thus tries to reformulate many solutions for revealing the hidden structure of the method in question, presented by the previous Huayan thinkers, as introduced in Hōtan’s Kyōshinshō and Kyunyŏ’s Wŏnt’ong ch’o. From these solutions, we can appreciate those ancient scholar-monks’ intense efforts to secure scholastic integrity and consistency so that this seemingly abstract method of counting ten could be well suited for their religious cultivation. This survey also suggests that we need to note the unnoticed history of intellectual exchanges in the East Asian tradition of Huayan scholasticism.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
