인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
‘비교사의 모험’, 유학은 어떻게 동아시아를 만들었는가? - 와타나베 히로시, 『동아시아의 왕권과 사상』을 읽고 ‘An Attempt at Comparative History’: How Did Neo-Confucianism Shape East Asia?
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第262輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.6
- 수록면
- 223 - 264 (42page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/tkhr.2024.06.262.223
‘비교사의 모험’, 유학은 어떻게 동아시아를 만들었는가? - 와타나베 히로시, 『동아시아의 왕권과 사상』을 읽고
초록·키워드
This article is a critical essay on Hiroshi Watanabe’s work and methodology, focusing on his various books. He analyses the history of Japanese political thought in a ‘historical context’, emphasising ‘comparisons’ with Japan’s past and its neighbours. For him, power in Edo Japan was rule by force, a politics of the ‘image of power’. In peacetime Edo Japan, the power of the samurai was maintained through the use of intimidating imagery and elaborate rituals to represent it. In the Edo image of violence, Neo-Confucianism took root in a unique form that would later shape Nihonism, or the Meiji Restoration’s drive to learn from the West. It also paved the way for the revival of the emperor. Confucianism never became a mainstream idea in Edo Japan, but it had an unexpected influence. Meanwhile, Joseon, the “nation of Li[理]”, had a very different historical trajectory from Japan. In Joseon, Confucianism was the central ideology of politics and society, and the “universality of Li” allowed for the control of arbitrary power and the enlightenment of all people. Unravelling the light and dark sides of this ideal, which is that “everyone can become a wise man[君子], but not everyone becomes a wise man”, has become an important task in the diverse history of Joseon reality.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-151-24-02-090096025