메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sharath K. Ramanath (Consultant Orthopedics, Fracture and Ortho Clinic, Bangalore, India) Tejas Tribhuvan (Department of Orthopedics, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, India) Uday Chandran (Department of Orthopedics, The Oxford Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, India) Rahul Hemant Shah (Department of Orthopedics, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, India) Ajay Kaushik (Department of Orthopedics, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, India) Sandesh Patil (Department of Orthopedics, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, India)
저널정보
대한고관절학회 Hip and Pelvis Hip and Pelvis Vol.36 No.1
발행연도
2024.3
수록면
37 - 46 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The prognosis of total hip replacement (THR) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus THR follow ing non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures is unclear. Few studies have been conducted in this regard. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to perform an assessment and compare the functional outcomes for study subjects in the ORIF and non-ORIF groups during the follow-up period compared to baseline. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal comparative study, which included 40 patients who underwent THR for either post traumatic arthritis after fixation of an acetabular fracture or arthritis following conservative management of a fracture, was conducted for 60 months. Twenty-four patients had undergone ORIF, and 16 patients had undergone nonoperative/conser vative management for acetabular fractures. Following THR, the patients were followed up for monitoring of functional out comes for the Harris hip score (HHS) and comparison between the ORIF and non-ORIF groups was performed. Results: The HHS showed significant improvement in both ORIF and non-ORIF groups. At the end of the mean follow-up period, no significant variation in scores was observed between the groups, i.e., ORIF group (91.61±6.64) compared to non ORIF group (85.74±11.56). A significantly higher number of re-interventions were required for medial wall fractures and combined fractures compared to posterior fractures (P<0.05). Conclusion: THR resulted in improved functional outcome during follow-up in both the groups; however, the ORIF group was observed to have better functional outcome. Re-intervention was not required for any of the posterior fractures at the end of the mean follow-up period.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0