메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강호원 (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea) 변수민 (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea) 김대유 (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea) 조윤재 (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Han-il General Hospital, Seoul, Korea) 경민규 (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea) 이동연 (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea)
저널정보
대한족부족관절학회 대한족부족관절학회지 대한족부족관절학회지 제28권 제1호
발행연도
2024.3
수록면
21 - 26 (6page)
DOI
10.14193/jkfas.2024.28.1.21

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Foot pressure measurement devices are used widely in clinical settings for plantar pressure assessments. Despite the availability of various devices, studies evaluating the inter-device reliability are limited. This study compared plantar pressure measurements ob- tained from HR Mat (Tekscan Inc.) and EMED-n50 (Novel GmbH). Materials and Methods: The study involved 38 healthy male volunteers. The participants were categorized into two groups based on the Meary’s angle in standing foot lateral radiographs: those with normal feet (angles ranging from –4° to 4°) and those with mild flatfeet (angles from –8° to –15°). The static and dynamic plantar pressures of the participants were measured using HR Mat and EMED-n50. The reliability of the contact area and mean force was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, the differ- ences in measurements between the two devices were examined, considering the presence of mild flatfoot. Results: The ICC values for the contact area and mean force ranged from 0.703 to 0.947, indicating good-to-excellent reliability across all areas. EMED-n50 tended to record higher contact areas than HR Mat. The mean force was significantly higher in the forefoot region when measured with EMED-n50, whereas, in the hindfoot region, this difference was observed only during static measurements with HR Mat. Participants with mild flatfeet exhibited significantly higher contact areas in the midfoot region for both devices, with no con- sistent differences in the other parameters. Conclusion: The contact area and mean force measurements of the HR Mat and EMED-n50 showed high reliability. On the other hand, EMED-n50 tended to record higher contact areas than HR Mat. In cases of mild flatfoot, an increase in contact area within the midfoot region was observed, but no consistent impact on the differences between the two devices was evident.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0