인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.9
- 수록면
- 127 - 154 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.24152/NCLE.2024.9.28.2.127
이용수
초록· 키워드
In this paper, I examine the textual history and its literary implications in the production of D. H. Lawrence’s Studies in Classic American Literature, as well as the significant changes in the foundational concepts of textual studies and the resulting contradictions at play in the transition from print to digital editions. I argue that the most fundamental issue at stake in the production of critical editions, whether print or digital, is the recognition that literary reading and textual reading are interdependent. After demonstrating the limitations of an understanding predicated on the binary of textual and literary reading, I explore the possible remediation of critical editions in digital form, arguing that combining the demands for precision of both textual and literary criticism is now more than ever a necessity as digitization becomes irreversible. By paying attention to the dynamics created by complex interdependence between literary and textual reading, the following discussion argues for a central role for literary reading in the construction of digital critical editions, while highlighting the inherent limitations of digital technology in this regard. The conclusion emphasizes the active engagement of humanities scholars in the digitization of knowledge, and the critical role that the politics of textual studies can play and fail to play.
#D. H. Lawrence
#Studies in Classic American Literature
#multiple versions
#critical editions
#textual reading
#literary reading
#digital remediation
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. Introduction
- Ⅱ. Textual Reading and Literary Reading in the Construction of Critical Editions
- Ⅲ. Digital Remediation and Its Irony
- Ⅳ. Possible Critical Scholarly Edition of SCAL in Digital Format
- Ⅴ. Remaining Fundamental Questions
- Work Cited
- Abstract