지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국국방연구원 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis Vol.36 No.2
- 발행연도
- 2024.6
- 수록면
- 231 - 254 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.22883/kjda.2024.36.2.005
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Why did the nuclear dominoes stop in Afghanistan? This paper is a logical analysis of this question. Nuclear dominoes are common in rival relations characterized by geographic proximity, ongoing military conflict, and mutual hostility. The U.S.– USSR–China–India–Pakistan cascade of nuclear weapons development is empirical evidence of this phenomenon. However, despite the development of nuclear weapons by its arch-enemy Pakistan, Afghanistan did not proliferate in response.
This study identifies and validates the reasons why Afghanistan did not (or could not) develop nuclear weapons, categorized into threat, capability, and constraint factors. The most significant finding is that Afghanistan did not perceive Pakistan’s nukes as a threat in terms of intention. Of course, it is also possible to argue that Afghanistan lacked the capacity to bear the various costs of developing nuclear weapons and that structural constraints imposed by international nonproliferation commitments, great power coercion, and regional balance of power dynamics prevented it from doing so. However, the root cause was the symbiotic relationship between the Taliban regime and Pakistan, temporarily easing the enduring rivalry, resulting in a bias in threat perception. These findings are consistent with the constructivist view of the importance of “shared understanding” in threat perception and challenge the realist perception that nuclear dominoes are inevitable in rivalry relationships. They are also significant because they provide clues for peace and stability in East Asia, one of the regions most likely to experience nuclear dominoes.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Is a Nuclear Domino Effect in Northeast Asia A Real Possibility?
Global Asia
2021 .06
-
아프가니스탄의 불안정성과 난민 문제: 파키스탄, 이란을 중심으로
한국중동학회논총
2022 .02
-
Afghanistan: Elite Tensions, Peace Negotiations, and the COVID Crisis
Acta Via Serica
2020 .12
-
Pakistan’s Nuclear Ambitions: The Debate over Doctrine
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2019 .01
-
북한·인도·파키스탄의 핵무장 정책 동인을 통해 본 북한의 핵보유국 지위 가능성
Journal of North Korea Studies
2018 .01
-
The Changing Nature of the India-Pakistan Rivalry: Analysis in South Asian Regional Context
평화학연구
2021 .06
-
Afghanistan’s Taliban 2.0 and Its Impact on Asia
Global Asia
2022 .03
-
미·중 전략경쟁 국면에서의 중국·아프가니스탄 외교 관계 분석
중동연구
2023 .03
-
지역 핵 무장국의 핵전략 결정요인 : 인도·파키스탄을 중심으로
한국군사
2018 .06
-
Pakistan’s Unique Nuclear Security Concerns
Global Asia
2016 .03
-
India–Pakistan, Limited War and Lopsided Deterrence: A Perspective
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
북한 핵문제의 고찰과 전술핵 배치에 대한 연구
대한정치학회보
2017 .01
-
Pakistan’s Evolving Strategic Outlook: Strategy and Nuclear Deterrence
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2016 .01
-
China and Pakistan in the Post-India-U.S. Nuclear Deal Scenario
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2015 .01
-
Crisis Stability and Escalation Control Challenge in South Asia: Pakistan’s Nuclear Development Efforts and Beyond
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2017 .12
-
North Korea’s Growing Nuclear Threat: Implications for the U.S. Extended Deterrence in the East Asian Region
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2017 .01
-
Challenges and Opportunities Facing Middle-Power Nonproliferation Overachieverss: The Republics of Kazakhstan and Korea
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2022 .12
-
American Responses to Possible South Korean Nuclear Weapon Development: Then and Now
Journal of Peace and Unification
2023 .05
-
North Korea Can Never Be a ‘Nuclear Weapon State.
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .08
-
북한 핵무기 위협에 대한 총력적 대비의 실태와 과제
군사
2016 .06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0