인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 1%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
This study examines the proclamation and execution of martial law from the 1952 Busan Political Crisis to the 1972 Yushin Coup, analyzing changes in martial law theory and the evolution of the military mobilization structure. Unlike previous studies that focus on the fundamental nature of martial law, this research highlights the discourse justifying martial law and its practical implementation. The 1952 Busan Political Crisis demonstrated how even a small military force could enable a loyalist coup. The April 1960 Revolution altered political, social, and legal perceptions of martial law’s power over life and death. The 1964 June 3rd Incident intensified debates on the legal conditions for martial law, and a Supreme Court ruling later legitimized its broad application under the Park Chung-hee regime. By the 1972 Yushin Coup, Park’s government institutionalized martial law as an extension of presidential emergency powers, a concept that was repeatedly reinforced in legal and military circles.
Meanwhile, the military mobilization structure expanded significantly after the 1961 coup. The establishment of the Capital Defense Command and the Special Warfare Command allowed the government to deploy forces outside the U.S. operational control. These units became crucial in both maintaining order under martial law and facilitating coups.
This study demonstrates that martial law was not merely a tool of authoritarian rule but evolved through legal and institutional shifts alongside military restructuring. It underscores the necessity of completing the democratization of the military through legal and institutional reforms. Given the rising threat of far-right political movements, safeguarding democratic institutions through systemic reforms is more urgent than ever.
Meanwhile, the military mobilization structure expanded significantly after the 1961 coup. The establishment of the Capital Defense Command and the Special Warfare Command allowed the government to deploy forces outside the U.S. operational control. These units became crucial in both maintaining order under martial law and facilitating coups.
This study demonstrates that martial law was not merely a tool of authoritarian rule but evolved through legal and institutional shifts alongside military restructuring. It underscores the necessity of completing the democratization of the military through legal and institutional reforms. Given the rising threat of far-right political movements, safeguarding democratic institutions through systemic reforms is more urgent than ever.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092456051