메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
배윤서 (서울대학교) 유종현 (서울대학교)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.16 No.1
발행연도
2025.2
수록면
75 - 91 (17page)
DOI
10.15531/KSCCR.2025.16.1.075

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examines greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction pathways in response to South Korea’s Constitutional Court ruling requiring legislation of annual reduction targets for 2031 ~ 2049. Through analysis of domestic and international cases, we investigate approaches to establishing reduction pathways, focusing on major economies including the EU, Germany, the UK, the US, Australia, China, and Japan. Our review of domestic literature reveals that, while several simulation-based studies exist, they primarily focus on reduction costs without considering benefits, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive approach. The international review shows that, while Germany has legislated specific annual targets and the UK employs five-year carbon budgets, most countries have not yet established detailed reduction pathways between their 2030 NDC and 2050 carbon neutrality goals, highlighting the importance of the Korean endeavor to design annual reduction targets. We find that Germany and the EU have adopted flexible approaches to emission pathways, while the UK emphasizes cost-benefit considerations in pathway design. Based on these findings, we explore the possibility of using cost-benefit analysis with integrated assessment models to evaluate various pathway options, demonstrating how this approach can balance economic efficiency with political feasibility. We suggest several important implications. First, comprehensive research on reduction pathways needs to be expanded in Korea. Second, flexible institutional arrangements, similar to those adopted in Germany and the UK, could be more effective than rigid annual targets. Third, we emphasize Korea-specific pathways that reflect national characteristics such as industrial structure and climate vulnerabilities. Finally, broad social discourse involving various stakeholders is essential, as the chosen pathway will have significant societal impacts over the coming decades.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 국내의 온실가스 감축경로 설정 논의
3. 국외의 온실가스 감축경로 설정 논의
4. 우리나라의 온실가스 감축경로 설정 예시: 비용-편익적 접근
5. 결론 및 제언
Reference

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092600022