인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
초록·키워드
The present study examines the role of systemic crises in democratic consolidation or backsliding, focusing on how these outcomes shape citizen preferences and institutional responses. Using South Korea as a case study, the analysis combines Luhmann ’s systemic theory with empirical data on demographic variations in issue salience and trust in institutions. In the 1990s, South Korea experienced major systemic crises that revealed weaknesses in its political and financial institutions, but the stability of its democratic system remained intact. The present study explores whether Korean systemic crises exhibit a self-referential or autopoietic nature, as Luhmann theorizes, and investigates citizens ’ preferences for systemic crises, particularly when social movements lack institutional access and have weak support structures. We analyze data from 1800 respondents using an individual-level field survey dataset to understand these preferences, variables such as gender, education, and individual income. Our findings indicate that the age, gender, income, and social class of an individual significantly influence citizens’ preferences for systemic crises. Specifically, younger individuals and those with higher incomes preferred systemic crises as opportunities for institutional reform. These results suggest that ascribed factors are critical in understanding the linkage between systemic crises and the functioning of democratic processes. The study underscores the importance of examining citizens’ preferences in systemic crises to provide an alternative understanding of democratic consolidation.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092521080
