지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2025.3
- 수록면
- 149 - 189 (41page)
- DOI
- 10.69596/JLL.2025.03.93.149
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to propose compensation protection measures for piece rate workers as well as individuals receiving piece rate compensation. Those receiving such compensation are paid based on specific tasks or performance. However, the existing wage-based legal and institutional protection mechanisms fail to adequately safeguard them.
The current Labor Standards Act classifies wage systems into hourly wages and piece rate wages. Article 47 stipulates regulations for the wage protection of piece rate workers. Additionally, Article 6, Paragraph 1, Clause 6 of the Enforcement Decree specifies the method for calculating the ordinary wage of piece rate compensation. Article 5, Paragraph 3 of the Minimum Wage Act also states that if it is inappropriate to determine the minimum wage based on hourly rates for those receiving piece rate compensation, the minimum wage may be set based on production or performance-based units. However, discussions and institutional measures to ensure income protection for those receiving piece rate compensation remain insufficient.
With the advancement of ICT technology and the growth of digital platform labor, the number of individuals receiving piece rate compensation has increased. Despite this, their income protection system remains inadequate. In particular, platform workers and freelancers often fail to be recognized as employees under the Labor Standards Act, leaving them in a legal blind spot. As a result, their compensation levels lack legal protection.
Therefore, this study discusses income protection measures for individuals receiving piece rate compensation from three perspectives. First, wage protection measures for cases where working hours can be clearly identified. Second, wage protection measures for cases where working hours are difficult to determine. Third, protection measures for those receiving piece rate compensation but not recognized as employees. To achieve this, the study analyzes the meaning of “piece rate” and compares domestic and international cases to derive effective protection measures.
The current Labor Standards Act classifies wage systems into hourly wages and piece rate wages. Article 47 stipulates regulations for the wage protection of piece rate workers. Additionally, Article 6, Paragraph 1, Clause 6 of the Enforcement Decree specifies the method for calculating the ordinary wage of piece rate compensation. Article 5, Paragraph 3 of the Minimum Wage Act also states that if it is inappropriate to determine the minimum wage based on hourly rates for those receiving piece rate compensation, the minimum wage may be set based on production or performance-based units. However, discussions and institutional measures to ensure income protection for those receiving piece rate compensation remain insufficient.
With the advancement of ICT technology and the growth of digital platform labor, the number of individuals receiving piece rate compensation has increased. Despite this, their income protection system remains inadequate. In particular, platform workers and freelancers often fail to be recognized as employees under the Labor Standards Act, leaving them in a legal blind spot. As a result, their compensation levels lack legal protection.
Therefore, this study discusses income protection measures for individuals receiving piece rate compensation from three perspectives. First, wage protection measures for cases where working hours can be clearly identified. Second, wage protection measures for cases where working hours are difficult to determine. Third, protection measures for those receiving piece rate compensation but not recognized as employees. To achieve this, the study analyzes the meaning of “piece rate” and compares domestic and international cases to derive effective protection measures.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
Ⅱ. 도급제 보수의 전개
Ⅲ. 도급제 노동자에 관한 법 제도의 현황 및 한계
Ⅳ. 도급제 보수의 보호 방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
도급제 임금에서의 통상임금 법리
노동법연구
2021 .09
-
임금 법제의 재견(再見)
노동법학
2024 .06
-
최저임금 영향 집단 노동 이행분석: 집단중심추세분석을 중심으로
한국행정논집
2023 .09
-
최저임금법상 문제점과 해결방향
노동법논총
2017 .12
-
최저임금제의 위헌성에 관한 연구 - 2017헌마1366 및 2018헌마1072(병합) 헌재 결정을 중심으로 -
노동법포럼
2020 .07
-
국외 중등 공학 교육 연구 동향 분석: 기술 교육 관련 학술지를 중심으로
대한공업교육학회지
2016 .03
-
최저임금제도의 새로운 구상과 법적 과제
노동법포럼
2017 .11
-
가사노동자의 최저임금제도 적용에 관한 쟁점과 대안
노동법학
2024 .06
-
Minimum Wage Effects on the Wage Distribution in South Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2021 .04
-
최저임금 비교대상임금의 범위 조정
노동법학
2018 .06
-
최저임금의 적용·결정과 그 예외에 관한 소론
노동법학
2024 .06
-
일본 최저임금제도의 동향과 과제 — 지역별·산업별 최저임금제도와 생활보호와의 관계 —
노동법논총
2019 .12
-
최저임금의 적용 차등화 방안 연구
노동법학
2018 .06
-
중국 최저임금제도의 주요내용과 문제
경희법학
2015 .01
-
최저임금제도의 문제점과 사회적 갈등 해소 방안
법과기업연구
2021 .04
-
2018~2019년 최저임금 인상의 고용 및 소득효과
산업노동연구
2022 .02
-
최저임금 조정이 노동자들의 노동시간과 노동소득에 미치는 영향
노동경제논집
2019 .01
-
디지털 전환시대 플랫폼 노동자의 법적 보호방안
법학연구
2021 .06
-
2020년 경기도 생활임금 산정 및 추진방안
정책연구
2019 .08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0