인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The central issue that Jeolla Governor Seo Yugu confronted during his tenure was a widespread breakdown of discipline (ki'gang) within the province. This erosion of order weakened the effectiveness of public authority and disrupted the enforcement of official directives. In response, Seo critically assessed local realities and reinforced the supervisory and punitive capacities of the provincial office, seeking to reconstruct the vertical order linking the central government, governor, magistrates, and local populations.
Seo also intervened in various administrative failures at the county level by reinterpreting existing regulations and disseminating effective practices from specific locales across the province. Through such efforts, the provincial government became a site not only of oversight but also of institutional design. The governor functioned as both an enforcer and a policymaker at the center of provincial administration. Moreover, in moments of conflict—between counties or between counties and military commands—Seo pursued negotiated resolutions grounded in precedent and local conditions rather than issuing unilateral judgments.
These practices demonstrate how the governor served as a central coordinator of competing powers, actively restructuring the local governance order. Seo’s case illustrates that late Chosŏn regional rule was not merely a system of top-down transmission from the center, but rather a field shaped by on-the-ground political practices and negotiations, with the governor as its mediating agent.
Seo also intervened in various administrative failures at the county level by reinterpreting existing regulations and disseminating effective practices from specific locales across the province. Through such efforts, the provincial government became a site not only of oversight but also of institutional design. The governor functioned as both an enforcer and a policymaker at the center of provincial administration. Moreover, in moments of conflict—between counties or between counties and military commands—Seo pursued negotiated resolutions grounded in precedent and local conditions rather than issuing unilateral judgments.
These practices demonstrate how the governor served as a central coordinator of competing powers, actively restructuring the local governance order. Seo’s case illustrates that late Chosŏn regional rule was not merely a system of top-down transmission from the center, but rather a field shaped by on-the-ground political practices and negotiations, with the governor as its mediating agent.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-093599466
