인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Since 1990s, all countries in the world have deeply recognized various climate catastrophes causing by the climate change. Recognizing this possible severity of human being's future by climate change, UN members have adopted several conventions including Paris Convention, and have duty implement to its nationally determined contributions (NDCs). As well known, EU has made consistent endeavors taking the lead to resolve the world-wide serious problems due to climate change. Namely, EU promulgated its CBAM in July 2021 to reduce world widely production of carbon-intensive products and use of embodied carbon dioxide emissions in global value chains. EU CBAM is scheduled to implement in full scale from January 2026. However, there are much possibilities of hot trade disputes against CBAM between EU and the much affected countries including China, Russia, India, etc, and also LDCs. Most of developing countries argue that EU CBAM is contrary to the principle of free and fair trade in GATT/WTO system. Therefore, there is much possibility of serious international trade disputes if the officially announced CBAM is enforced without considering the position of developing countries. This article, therefore, examines rationales of EU CBAM, the positions of other countries including main developing nations, conformity of CBAM with WTO rules. And also, it explores the supposed scenarios of trade disputes in WTO/DSB between the concerned country groups, and tries to find and propose some alternatives and implications of EU CBAM.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-093827296
