메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(한림대학교)
저널정보
중국근현대사학회 중국근현대사연구 中國近現代史硏究 第106輯
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    This article investigates the development of judicial reform in the Three Northeastern Provinces (Dongsansheng) during the late Qing dynasty’s New Policy(Xinzheng) period, focusing on the establishment of the Judicial Bureaus (Tifasi) and Courts (Shenpanting). The aim is to supplement existing research, which has largely centered on Fengtian, by conducting a comparative analysis of Fengtian, Jilin, and Heilongjiang. Through this approach, the study seeks to comprehensively examine how regional conditions influenced the formation of court systems in each province.
    Following the Qing government’s designation of the Three Northeastern Provinces as pilot regions for the new judicial system, each province initiated preparatory efforts for establishing trial courts. Initially, a Judicial Bureau was installed in each province as the provincial-level judicial-administrative agency, taking the lead in organizing the new court system. At the same time, due to practical limitations, this bureau also assumed the functions of the traditional Judicial Commissioner(Anchasi). While the Judicial Bureau directed the establishment of the courts, clear provincial differences emerged based on factors such as the level of support from the central government, availability of human and financial resources, and the existence of institutional foundations. Fengtian, with substantial backing from the central government, was able to establish a relatively comprehensive judicial structure in a short period. In contrast, Jilin and Heilongjiang developed more limited systems due to resource constraints.
    Although all three provinces pursued the common goal of building a modern court system, the actual implementation varied significantly depending on the political, economic, and social circumstances of each province. This highlights the importance of considering regional diversity in studies of late Qing and early modern Chinese judicial reform.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-093928118