인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
The aim of this study is to analyze gaps in environmental performance among different levels of environmental resources in small and medium sized exporters (SMEs) in the Republic of Korea (Korea). To achieve this aim, the study develops measurement variables and items based on prior research, conducts a survey of SMEs, and collects 204 responses. The data are tested for reliability using Cronbach’s alpha and for validity using factor analysis. The relationships between variables are examined through cluster analysis, analysis of variance, and post hoc analysis.
The results are as follows: First, environmental performance is classified into reduction of environmental pollution, operational performance, and environmental cost savings. This classification indicates that environmental performance is divided into non-financial performance (reduction of environmental pollution), process performance (operational performance), and financial performance (environmental cost savings).
Second, there are gaps in environmental performance among different levels of environmental resources. Environmental resources are firms’ unique resources, and when combined with environmental pressures, they shape the environmental strategies, leading to variations in environmental performance.
SMEs achieve environmental performance by securing environmental resources as strategic assets.
Third, there are real gaps in environmental performance among different levels of environmental resources. Firms with high levels of environmental resources attain high levels of environmental performance, whereas firms with low levels of environmental resources achieve low levels of environmental performance.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지The results are as follows: First, environmental performance is classified into reduction of environmental pollution, operational performance, and environmental cost savings. This classification indicates that environmental performance is divided into non-financial performance (reduction of environmental pollution), process performance (operational performance), and financial performance (environmental cost savings).
Second, there are gaps in environmental performance among different levels of environmental resources. Environmental resources are firms’ unique resources, and when combined with environmental pressures, they shape the environmental strategies, leading to variations in environmental performance.
SMEs achieve environmental performance by securing environmental resources as strategic assets.
Third, there are real gaps in environmental performance among different levels of environmental resources. Firms with high levels of environmental resources attain high levels of environmental performance, whereas firms with low levels of environmental resources achieve low levels of environmental performance.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Abstract
- Ⅰ. Introduction
- Ⅱ. Literature review
- Ⅲ. Research hypothesis
- Ⅳ. Data collection methods and analysis methods
- Ⅴ. The results
- Ⅵ. Discussion
- Ⅶ. Conclusion
- References
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094385890
