메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(Lloyd’s Register) (Lloyd’s Register) (Lloyd’s Register)
저널정보
한국마린엔지니어링학회 Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology (JAMET) 한국마린엔지니어링학회지 제49권 제5호
발행연도
수록면
385 - 400 (16page)
DOI
10.5916/jamet.2025.49.5.385

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

To support global decarbonisation, the maritime industry is increasingly adopting alternative fuels such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), methanol, ammonia, and hydrogen. While these fuels offer environmental benefits by reducing emissions, compared to conventional marine fuels they also introduce significant safety hazards. These hazards include higher flammability, explosion potential, and toxicity. This study presents a comparative Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) of fuel oil, LNG, methanol, and hydrogen on a 170-metre RoPax ferry, evaluating both individual and societal risks. Using the DeRisk<sub>beta</sub> tool, fuel-specific hazards have been assessed and integrated with historical casualty data from non-fuel-related events to derive overall results. The results indicate that hydrogen presents the greatest fuel-specific risk, with a Potential Loss of Life (PLL) approximating 5.4E-03 fatalities per ship-year, primarily due to its high explosion potential. LNG follows, with a PLL approximating 2.1E-03, whereas methanol and fuel oil show a comparatively lower risk of 1.2E-04 and 3.3E-05, respectively. While all fuels meet the IMO’s individual risk acceptance criteria, for hydrogen and LNG, calculating societal risk illustrates the potential for high-fatality events that would not be identified by calculation of individual risk. This study underscores the importance of integrating societal risk into safety evaluations.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. Abstract
  2. 1. Introduction
  3. 2. Safety Level of Conventional RoPax
  4. 3. Basis of Quantitative Risk Assessment
  5. 4. QRA for RoPax using Fuel Oil, LNG, Methanol, and Hydrogen
  6. 5. Conclusion
  7. References

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094529249