메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(Seoul National University of Science & Technology) (Seoul National University of Science & Technology) (Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
저널정보
대한산업공학회 Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Vol.24 No.4
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) evaluation helps identify corporate risks and opportunities using various indicators. However, current models consider safety a lagging social dimension indicator. Here, we propose a hybrid ESG model that effectively integrates leading and lagging safety indicators. Through analyzing global and domestic ESG frameworks, we reveal key limitations in existing safety assessments and highlight the importance of proactive safety metrics for accurate sustainability evaluation. A mixed-method approach was employed to validate the efficacy of the hybrid model. The findings confirm that combining leading and lagging indicators improves ESG assessment accuracy. We recommend expanding ESG into an “environmental, social, safety, and governance (ESSG)” framework by formally recognizing safety as a standalone dimension. The proposed ESSG model organizes evaluations into four distinct areas with 30 refined indicators, facilitating balanced, holistic assessments. The 30 indicators were selected based on six institutional frameworks, and their weightings were derived using the analytic hierarchy process, validat- ing the prioritization of leading safety metrics. This approach promotes proactive risk management and ensures safety is a core component of sustainable business practices. The ESSG framework enhances ESG evaluation by fostering long-term resilience and stakeholder trust.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094586735