인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement at the COP21 in 2015, countries have been required to submit their NDCs every five years. In particular, the LULUCF sector within the NDCs plays a significant role in evaluating carbon sinks and achieving national GHG reduction targets. However, there is a lack of systematic research analyzing the methods for setting targets and contributions for the LULUCF sector within national NDCs. This study aims to analyze the differences in carbon sink targets within the LULUCF sector across national NDCs to explore the diversity of mitigation strategies. The study analyzed the NDCs and National Inventory Reports of 133 countries, categorizing the approaches into three types based on the method used to calculate greenhouse gas removals between the base year and the target year (total emissions-net emissions, net emissions-net emissions, and total emissions-total emissions). The analysis revealed that different forest-related characteristics were associated with each accounting approach. The results show that 67 countries adopted the gross-net approach, which reflects structural declines in forest carbon sinks; 30 countries used the net-net approach; and 36 countries applied the gross-gross approach. This study provides analytical evidence that differences in national circumstances and forest structures influence the methods used for NDC target setting, thereby offering a basis for future policy formulation.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-095634561
