인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Objectives: By specifically considering the regulations on contract work under the German Occupational Safety and Health Act, it can be examined whether the regulations on contract work under the Occupational Safety and Health Related Act in South Korea are rational and effective for preventing industrial accidents. Methods: Recognizing that the Occupational Safety and Health Act in South Korea has multiple issues with its effectiveness regarding contract work and requires improvement, this study examines the literature from a comparative perspective focusing on contract regulation under the German Occupational Safety and Health Act. In addition, from the perspective of legal policy studies, it draws implications for contract regulation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Korea and suggests ways to improve it. Results: The Occupational Safety and Health Act in Germany does not impose an obligation to add or replace prisoners or to directly protect workers employed by contractors in the same way as the obligations and responsibilities borne by employers. From the perspective of the contractor's workers, the obligation to cooperate and oversee imposes an obligation to reorganize the system in order to cope with the special risks caused by sharing a workplace and imposes a 'unique obligation' on the contractor. Conclusions: Germany's Occupational Safety and Health Act basically centers the contractor's obligation to take safety and health measures. Where the contractor is obligated to take safety and health measures, only obligations worthy of the contractor's status and role are imposed.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.