인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
This study conducts a forensic linguistic analysis of courtroom discourse in the Constitutional Court’s presidential impeachment trial, focusing on the examination of witness Kwak Jong-geun. The dataset consists of 53,152 words of publicly available hearing transcripts, including direct and cross-examinations, judicial questioning, and final statements. Using frameworks from Legal Discourse Analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis, the study examines how power, ideological positioning, and responsibility attribution are discursively constructed in an adversarial setting. The analysis targets three dimensions: interactional power relations, lexicalization patterns, and question-answer organization. Results show that interpretive outcomes are shaped by competing macropropositions and by discourse strategies such as question control, limits on explanatory scope, and strategic address-term use. Lexical features, including cognition verbs and evaluative adverbs, function as markers of evidential stance. The findings highlight impeachment trial discourse as a key site of institutional meaning-making through language.
#courtroom discourse
#presidential impeachment trial
#forensic linguistics
#critical discourse analysis
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
