인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The intensifying technological competition between the United States and China has emerged as a defining feature of contemporary international relations, with profound implications for the global governance of emerging technologies. This study examines the fundamental ideological and structural differences between democratic and authoritarian approaches to Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance, analyzing how this competition shapes the formation of international norms, standards, and institutions. Drawing on regime theory and comparative institutional analysis, this research develops a systematic typology that distinguishes democratic AI governance models—characterized by multi-stakeholder participation, rights based regulation, and transparency requirements—from authoritarian models that emphasize state-led development, sovereignty-based regulation, and centralized control. The study employs mixed methods combining qualitative content analysis of policy documents, comparative case studies of multilateral negotiations, and quantitative assessment of governance maturity indicators. Analysis of three critical cases—ISO/IEC AI standardization, UN Global Digital Compact negotiations, and OECD AI Principles development—reveals how ideological differences translate into competing institutional strategies. Findings demonstrate three major structural changes in global AI governance. The first is the shift from consensus-based to contested standard-setting processes, with the United States leveraging traditional technical organizations while China increases participation in alternative forums. The second is the fragmentation of regulatory approaches along democratic authoritarian lines, reflected in divergent emphases on privacy protection versus state sovereignty. The third is the emergence of parallel cooperation mechanisms, as value-based coalitions supplement universal multilateral institutions.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
