인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
In this paper, we study the highest bid price determination mechanism of the court auction markets for apartments that are under distraint because of the insolvency of the owner of the apartments. In addition to the typical variables used in previous literatures on the determination of highest bid price, we add the variables that represent the characteristics of the tenants categorized by the priority order of the tenants' deposits in the distribution process of the money obtained from the auction of the apartments.
Unlike our general perception, the results show that the presence of pretense tenants on the priority list of the distribution of dividend from the auction hardly affects the determination of the highest bid price. In addition, the presence of legal counter power of tenants against the landlord does not affect the highest bid price, either.
The first policy implication of this paper is that to set up a fair institutional mechanism in court auction market for apartments under distraint, the auction court needs to ask the applicant of the auction to prove whether the listed tenants are true to eliminate the pretense tenants. The second policy implication is that the court needs to disapprove the seniority of the pretense tenants' claim on the distribution of dividends from auction of the apartments.
#아파트 경매 낙찰가율
#응찰자
#가장임차인
#채권자
#임차인의 유형
#Apartment bid rate
#Bidder
#Pretense tenants
#Creditor
#Types of tenant
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
