인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.9
- 수록면
- 35 - 62 (28page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
This article is an empirical analysis of the cases of preventive diplomacypracticed for conflicts during the post-Cold War era. It focuses on establishingand verifying the hypotheses on the successes and failures of preventive diplo-macy. For an analytical framework, it accesses the definition and theory ofpreventive diplomacy, along with three case studies: denuclearization of the formerSoviet republics, civil war in East Timor, and the North Korean nuclear crisis.This research found that the definition of the concept hardly reflects thereality and has some limitations in its application to empirical study. For thisreason, it has taken preventive diplomacy as the PKO activities, which make itpossible to easily collect data and clearly identify the beginning of interventionand the number of participating actors. Then it verifies the hypotheses on thesuccesses of preventive diplomacy based on the conflict data over a 10-yearperiod during the post-Cold War era.For the empirical analysis, this paper selected three of Lunds successfactorstiming of intervention, support from major powers, and state autonomyand added another factor: namely geographical region. The main findings ofthis paper are as follows: First, timing is a vital factor. PKO intervention wasmost successful at the latent level of conflict. Second, intervention of majorpowers is also significant. The intervention of the United States yielded a highrate of success. Third, state autonomy is not a critical factor. Domestic andinternational conflicts showed no differences in the success of PKO. Fourth,geographical region proved to be an important factor.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
