메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(한양대학교)
저널정보
미국소설학회 미국소설 미국소설 제15권 제2호
발행연도
수록면
73 - 97 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

One of Hawthorne’s main concerns is the issue on man’s sin?secret sin, unpardonable sin, problem of conscience, recognition of sin, or its influences on individuals and community. In his major works, he criticizes the rigors or bigoted morals of his Puritan ancestors, condemns man’s haughty pursuit for the absolute rivalling that of God, or doubts the possibility of realizing earthly paradise only through man’s good will. His scientists are not exceptional: they reveal the dangers of the scientists’ arrogance and biased pursuit for scientific achievements, and warn the tragic outcome from their attempts to be earthly gods. He views that any artificial endeavors to better human society by improving unreasonable institutions or customs are useless, and that it is dangerous to interpret God’s will in his own arbitrary way and try to use it for the private interests or desire. His beliefs are similar to those of Calvinists who believe in the Predestination stating that one’s salvation is decided from the beginning and in the Original Sin from which no one can be free. This paper treats two types of scientists: the one is those who accept human limits in their pursuit of scientific truths and are cautious not to lose their humanity, and the other is those who boldly challenge God's power and wisdom and destroy others as well as themselves. Examples of the former would be Heidegger and Owen, and those of the latter would be Aylmer, Rappaccini, Baglioni, Giovanni, Chillingworth and Westervelt. This paper analyzes these characters in the context of the adequacy of their scientific pursuits and results.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기