건축평론에서의 은유

이해욱; 민상충

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 이해욱 (부산외국어대학교) 민상충 (전북대학교)

저널정보: 한국독어학회 독어학 독어학 제19호

발행연도: 2009.6

수록면: 1 - 24 (24page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법: 이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?

🏆

연구결과: 이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?

초록· 키워드

The present paper is concerned with metaphors used by architects in the building review and aims to show how architects conceptualize and verbalize their particular experiences in the world through metaphor. The research was informed by cognitive linguistic theory of metaphor expounded in Lakoff & Johnson (1980). A case in point in the analysis of architectural texts is the difference between what are referred to as image metaphors and conceptual metaphors in the cognitive linguistics approach. The former are metaphors that map mental images onto other mental images by virtue of their external resemblance. These are contrasted with those metaphors that map more abstract knowledge across two domains and are referred to as conceptual metaphors. The analysis is done on the corpus of 42 texts drawn from 4 German architectural magazines. The dataset comprised 373 instances, which were further sorted according to the domains providing the sources for the metaphors. Architectural metaphors within the corpus draw upon divers experiential domains, among these are organic, textile, language, music and machine. These yield conceptual and image metaphors, which appear evenly distributed in the corpus. Conceptual metaphors represent 44% in the corpus and image metaphors 56%. Concerning conceptual metaphors, it was observed that most expressions belong to the structural metaphors ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE IS MAKING CLOTH/LINGUISTIC PRACTICE/MUSIC. In general textile, music and language metaphors highlight the structured quality of buildings. The second large set of expressions draws upon image metaphors. The image sources mapped onto architectural targets are of different sorts and can be grouped into organic sources and inorganic sources. Among the former the most recurrent come from the biological domain, and concern animal body parts, followed by plant terms. Inorganic sources comprise geometrical shapes etc. In short, architects make active use of both conceptual and image metaphors. The discussion also addresses the difficult issue of metaphor classification, and proposes a combination of cognitive and discourse procedures in order to approach the differences between metaphor types.

The present paper is concerned with metaphors used by architects in the building review and aims to show how architects conceptualize and verbalize their particular experiences in the world through metaphor. The research was informed by cognitive linguistic theory of metaphor expounded in Lakoff & Johnson (1980). A case in point in the analysis of architectural texts is the difference between what are referred to as image metaphors and conceptual metaphors in the cognitive linguistics approach. The former are metaphors that map mental images onto other mental images by virtue of their external resemblance. These are contrasted with those metaphors that map more abstract knowledge across two domains and are referred to as conceptual metaphors.The analysis is done on the corpus of 42 texts drawn from 4 German architectural magazines. The dataset comprised 373 instances, which were further sorted according to the domains providing the sources for the metaphors. Architectural metaphors within the corpus draw upon divers experiential domains, among these are organic, textile, language, music and machine. These yield conceptual and image metaphors, which appear evenly distributed in the corpus. Conceptual metaphors represent 44% in the corpus and image metaphors 56%. Concerning conceptual metaphors, it was observed that most expressions belong to the structural metaphors ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE IS MAKING CLOTH/LINGUISTIC PRACTICE/MUSIC. In general textile, music and language metaphors highlight the structured quality of buildings. The second large set of expressions draws upon image metaphors. The image sources mapped onto architectural targets are of different sorts and can be grouped into organic sources and inorganic sources. Among the former the most recurrent come from the biological domain, and concern animal body parts, followed by plant terms. Inorganic sources comprise geometrical shapes etc.In short, architects make active use of both conceptual and image metaphors. The discussion also addresses the difficult issue of metaphor classification, and proposes a combination of cognitive and discourse procedures in order to approach the differences between metaphor types.

#개념은유 #konzeptuelle Metapher #Image Metapher #영상은유 #Diskursanalyse #담화분석

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기

배경 및 목적
대상 및 방법론
분석 및 수행
결과 및 의의

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI가 분석한 연구 핵심

이 논문의 한줄 요약

이 논문의 연구방법

목차

참고문헌

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)