인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.5
- 수록면
- 149 - 163 (15page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
This essay examines the difference between Swift’s and Pope’s satire, whose style and method differed widely, even though they were close friends and had the same Tory inclinations. Swift thought that the capitalist economic order represented by the South Sea Bubble produced both corruptions and the disruptions to the English society. The importance of land was being destroyed by a capitalist society that computed all value according to the rise and fall of stocks. From this point of view, he attacks the consequences of a new capitalist system on the English society, but he does not put forward a norm in his satires. In fact, he does not allow any single view and seems to accept the world as he saw it. Unlike Swift, however, Pope divides the world into the realms of order and chaos, so he wants to attack chaos by means of a norm. In other words, his satire presupposes an object of attack and the ideal world view. In Pope’s satire, Man of Ross is portrayed to help the poor, construct public pathways, and give medicine to the sick. In short, he symbolizes the Tory ideal society in which landlord and tenant were bound together in reciprocal assistance. From this viewpoint of the ideal world view, Pope satirizes the new financial order and Walpole in his satires, because they destroy the traditional society. While Pope puts forward both a norm and an object of attack in his satires, Swift focuses on satirizing an object of attack, and does not present any norm.
#Swift
#Swift
#Pope
#Pope
#satire
#satire
#South Sea Bubble
#South Sea Bubble
#Tory
#Tory
#capitalist economic order
#capitalist economic order
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
