인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
This study examined the effects of different levels of vicarious interactions on critical thinking. A posttest only experimental design with three groups was used for this study. The control group read a fact sheet (expository text) only. The two experimental groups read either a high or low level discussion transcript with the fact sheet. The dependent variable was critical thinking measured by the Washington State University Critical Thinking Rubric. Letters (posttests) from 58 participants were scored using this rubric. ANOVA results indicated that the higher interaction group scored significantly higher than the other two groups. Fisher’s exact test revealed that when each component of the rubric was analyzed, there were no significant differences on any single component. Qualitative analysis of post treatment surveys and interviews showed that discussions mostly helped the participants reinforce their ideas and strengthen their arguments. Findings of this study imply the need for instructor intervention to increase the quality of online discussions and stimulate critical thinking. The use of vicarious experiences is also recommended to model exemplary discussions for learners.
#vicarious interactions
#vicarious interactions
#critical thinking
#critical thinking
#online discussions
#online discussions
#discussion level
#discussion level
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
