인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
The blood was not so valued before the Goryeo Dynasty, and thus adopting sons from different clans were not uncommon. In the Goryeo Dynasty, however, community members began to make more of blood and so run in their blood through their family names. As a result, they imposed stricter conditions on adoptees and limited the adoptable to children aged less than 3. In the Joseon Dynasty, the society began to pursue Confucianism and then did not qualify sons adopted from different clans to succeed to family lines. Instead, however, it allowed its members to adopt sons aged less than 3 from different clans and eunuch families to adopt sons from different clans. The system lasted during the Joseon Dynasty. During the Japanese occupation, however, adoptees from different clans were not accepted without exception. Then one day of 1939, with the Ordinance-19 the Joseon civil affairs ordinance was revised. Resultingly, Koreans were forced to change their Korean-style names into Japanese-style names and at the same time were allowed to adopt their sons-in-law as their sons and to adopt sons from different clans.
After Korea was liberated from Japanese colonial rule, the U.S. military government enacted a special law ‘Restoration of Korean Names’ as it nullified the names changed into Japanese styles and defeased ordinances, laws, orders and even notifications against the special law. However, there was controversy as to how far the special law would be applied. Considering the debate on the recognition of adoptees from different clans and sons-in-law as adoptees under the Ordinance-19 enacted in 1939 and the relevant explanation of Japanese Government-General Korea, it is judged that the recognition of adoptees from different clans and sons-in-law as adoptees is closely related to the change of Korean-style names into Japanese-style names, whereupon adoptees from different clans and sons-in-law as adoptees are deemed to be against the special law.
After independence, the administration was executed in accordance with the foregoing interpretation. On May 24, 1994, however, the full panel of the Supreme Court ruled that adoptees adopted from different clans was not illegal until the Joseon civil affairs ordinance was amended on February 11, 1940 (sentence-93므119) and thus broke the precedent. The ruling suggests that the ‘Restoration of Korean Names’ was not to address the problems of adoptees but was only to restore Japanese-style names to Korean-style names. The problem was that the family name system was not reflected in the ruling. The ruling was confined to cases on which the ruling would not exert any influences. However, it is a pity that the full panel of the Supreme Court did not pay close attention when broking the precedent.
#Restoration of Korean Names
#조선성명복구령
#이성양자
#the adoptee from different clan
#서양자
#sons-in-law as adoptees
#the Japanization of Korean names
#창씨개명
#조선민사령
#the Joseon civil affairs ordinance
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
