메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(연세대학교)
저널정보
한국문법교육학회 문법교육 문법 교육 제28권
발행연도
수록면
211 - 236 (26page)
DOI
10.21850/kge.2016.28..211

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

This paper is a study on the loan-words and notations in the Korean textbooks and the understanding of them among Korean teachers. Korean teachers seem to have a basic understanding of loan-words, but, at the same time, take into consideration loan-words and notations that can be seen in the real world. In the case of textbooks, there was a strong opinion that they should include orthography words, Likewise in the case of social network services(SNS) where orthography words were not yet established, it was highly suggested that they should be written in Hangeul. This seems to be due to the norms and formalities of the textbooks. On the other hand, there is a tendency to use loan-words in writing on the blackboard and teacher's spoken languages rather than loan-words, and even to write on the blackboard in English rather than Hangul. This seems to be due to the actuality of loan-words. In other words, it can be seen that the textbook preserves the normality but the actual teaching considers the actuality in the real world at the same time.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기