인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
In many countries, social investment viewpoints are very much emphasized in diverse areas of social policies. This trends are related with many factors, such as high unemployment rates, growing numbers of the old population, and inefficiencies of the old social welfare systems. Even though Korea is at the stage where the net level of welfare expenditure should be increased, Korean society is also facing the above mentioned social problems which should be solved by new social policies. Thus, it is helpful for Korean society to review the realities, problems, and featuring characteristics of social investment policies among major countries where those policies were already implemented, in order to get useful framework to evaluate many policy alternatives Korean society might adopt.
This study reviews social investment policies among western welfare countries according to the three major welfare regimes-liberal, conservative, and social democratic. The findings show that countries in liberal welfare regime, such as Canada, England, and the US, increase the level of total expenditures spending social investment policies and emphasize the role of private sectors providing welfare services. Conservative welfare regime also strongly underscores the policies focusing on social investment viewpoints. Sweden and Denmark, the countries representing social democratic welfare regime do not show the dramatic change in old welfare systems, but try to increase the efficiencies of welfare systems and the number of service providers.
The study also analyses social investment policies among major western countries according to the policy objectives-children, women, and the elderly. Children are the most important welfare beneficiaries in the social investment policies. Care services and educational services for younger children are very much emphasized in most countries. For women, many institutional changes and new services increasing the possibilities managing "work and family" are found in many countries. Actually the services for children and for women are interwound with each other. The polices for the elderly include job training services and social care services. In most countries these policies for the elderly are considered as highly urgent policies.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지This study reviews social investment policies among western welfare countries according to the three major welfare regimes-liberal, conservative, and social democratic. The findings show that countries in liberal welfare regime, such as Canada, England, and the US, increase the level of total expenditures spending social investment policies and emphasize the role of private sectors providing welfare services. Conservative welfare regime also strongly underscores the policies focusing on social investment viewpoints. Sweden and Denmark, the countries representing social democratic welfare regime do not show the dramatic change in old welfare systems, but try to increase the efficiencies of welfare systems and the number of service providers.
The study also analyses social investment policies among major western countries according to the policy objectives-children, women, and the elderly. Children are the most important welfare beneficiaries in the social investment policies. Care services and educational services for younger children are very much emphasized in most countries. For women, many institutional changes and new services increasing the possibilities managing "work and family" are found in many countries. Actually the services for children and for women are interwound with each other. The polices for the elderly include job training services and social care services. In most countries these policies for the elderly are considered as highly urgent policies.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 문제제기
- Ⅱ. 주요국가의 사회투자정책
- Ⅲ. 정책대상별 사회투자정책의 현황과 방향
- Ⅳ. 결론
- 참고문헌
- 〈Abstract〉
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-019541387
