인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
The question concerning the foundations of morality can be divided into two subquestions, namely 'Why should we be moral?' and 'Why do we act morally?' The first question has been asked by philosophers for thousands of years from many different traditions. In the Western tradition Plato and Kant among many philosophers have been especially influential in their accounts of the problem of how we ought to live. They thought there is a solid reason why we should be moral, and tried to explain it in terms of the Universal-Transcendendal-Ideal structure. In this paper I refute this approach (especially the Kantian one) and pursue the second question instead. I believe we cannot give a satisfactory answer to the first question because most answers given so far have been based on the unrealistic Ideals. We could only give an answer to the second. It means that we should give up our hope to find any sort of rational justification of morality. So the method employed in this study is that of moral psychology. My conclusion is that the basis of morality is not reason but emotion or sentiment. I believe it could be fully supported by our live experience.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 도덕의 근거에 대한 기존의 입장들
- Ⅲ. 도덕의 근거로서의 감정
- Ⅳ. 도덕적 규범은 정당화될 수 있는가?
- Ⅴ. 결론
- 참고문헌
- 〈Abstract〉
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-019543578
