메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
미래인문사회연구소 한국 사회과학연구 사회과학논총 제27집 1호
발행연도
수록면
163 - 186 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

There have been massive changes in the policy framework of US public assistance systems since late 1990's. Especially, the TANF rules imposing mandatory work requirements for all welfare recipients are increasingly strengthened after the 2005 re-authorizing process on the program. US government again stressed the importance of employment supporting services for the welfare recipients who have multiple barriers as well as who are relatively easy to get a job in short time. In order to increase employment rates among welfare recipients, both federal government and state government positively utilize the intermediary institutions which directly connect recipients to people who want to hire workers.
This study reviews US work supporting services in the welfare systems especially focusing on the recent changes after the 2005 TANF program re-authorization. The main purpose of this review lies on getting policy implications for Korean work supporting services in the public assistance program, which tries to find new and effective ways to support Korean welfare recipients who are eagerly to find jobs.
In order to achieving this purpose, this study first explores the coverage and types of intermediary institutions providing work supporting services in the US welfare systems. In addition, this study investigates the main characteristics of intermediary institutions-including non-profit, profit, educational, and public organization- and the relationships between these institutions and state(or local) government. Based on the types of relationships between these two parts, this study categorizes the roles of intermediary institutions into four groups: (1) state government -welfare department model, (2) intermediary institutions model, (2) state government- work development department model, (4) work development department services process model.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. Ⅰ. 문제제기
  2. Ⅱ. 미국 자활서비스 공급주체의 현황
  3. Ⅲ. 미국 자활서비스 공급주체의 특성
  4. Ⅳ. 결론
  5. 참고문헌
  6. 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-019544313