인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
This study examined reasons for using multiple assessors and ways of using the information from the assessors in the assessment of psychosocial treatment outcome. The theoretical background is largely based on social constructionism, which helps to understand that the assessment of mental health and social functioning of clients is constructed by the socio-cultural environment and the interaction between the client and other assessors including psychosocial treatment providers. Practical reasons for employing multiple assessors are two-folded: one is to do comprehensive assessments by viewing the client's mental health and social functioning in relation to various types of social situations in which the client functions and interacts with others; and the other is to detect potential negative effects of the psychosocial treatment on the client and her/his life. The assessments by multiple assessors can result in shared and/or a unique view of the outcome. In making use of these two parts out of multiple assessors, three major theoretical issues were discussed: (1) the limitation of the conventional approach to the outcome assessment (e.g., lack of identification of the assessor's standpoint, conclusion of the outcome based on a single criterion or assessor); (2) dilemma that can occur in using social constructionism; and (3) modification of the approach to fit into the social work practice. Based on these theoretical considerations, three quantitative methods of utilizing the information from multiple assessors are: application of multi-trait multi-method matrix using correlational analysis, factor analysis, and the tripartite model. It is emphasized that the use of multiple assessors in quantitative study of psychosocial treatment outcome is consistent with the major social work value "person-in-social- environment." Implications for social work practice and research in using multiple assessors were discussed.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 문제제기와 연구질문
- Ⅱ. 다각적 평가자 입장과 그 활용에 대한 기존 연구 동향
- Ⅲ. 다각적 평가자를 활용한 필요성
- Ⅳ. 다각적 평가자 사용의 이론적 근거와 실천적 접근
- Ⅴ. 다각적 평가자 활용을 통한 성과평가 방법
- Ⅵ. 함의와 제언
- 참고문헌
- 〈Abstract〉
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-019544540
