인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
As we have seen, I give an outline of the main provisions of UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications on Int'l Contracts and notable points on its application in practice, which already adopted, at sixtieth session of the General Assembly.
The conclusions are as follows:
As comments of the Chinese Government on the Draft Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in Int'l Contracts, UN Electronic Convention avoided, to the extent possible, interference of the domestic laws of a Contracting State, maintains the principle of party autonomy, does not deal with substantive subject of contact laws, like as the validity of contact and liabilities of concerned parties and also provisions of regulatory nature, avoids a dual regimes of contract law in same trade dealing with only special issues regarding to the use of electronic communications on the formation and performance of a contract. It also retains the principles of functional equivalence between paper form and electronic form and technological neutrality. Therefore, it is a stand-alone instrument regarding to legal recognition on electronic communications and can contribute to remove the legal obstacles to use of electronic communications exchanged under other int'l conventions.
But in the view of point from article 1, 19, 20, the convention give an excessively broad scope of application, which was unusual in int'l trade related instruments. So participation of the convention from a number of state might not be expected in consideration of strong disagreeing of singapore, Canada, France, China regarding to, in particularly, form requirements.
When the parties trade with the country, in particularly, like a Russia, they can meet its form requirement through the principle of party autonomy and then have to seek their own safety in the facilitation of convention because it was submitted that unrestricted party autonomy could undermine the entire convention and could permit parties to derogate from mandatory national laws.
The electronic convention definitely is a stand-alone instrument but when it is used in connection with the UNCITRAL instruments listed in article 20, paragraph 1, as far as electronic communications exchanged under the existing int'l conventions, it can do duty as, for example, e-CISG but if its use separates from them, it can not be maintained relationship with them like as relationship between e-UCP and UCP.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지The conclusions are as follows:
As comments of the Chinese Government on the Draft Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in Int'l Contracts, UN Electronic Convention avoided, to the extent possible, interference of the domestic laws of a Contracting State, maintains the principle of party autonomy, does not deal with substantive subject of contact laws, like as the validity of contact and liabilities of concerned parties and also provisions of regulatory nature, avoids a dual regimes of contract law in same trade dealing with only special issues regarding to the use of electronic communications on the formation and performance of a contract. It also retains the principles of functional equivalence between paper form and electronic form and technological neutrality. Therefore, it is a stand-alone instrument regarding to legal recognition on electronic communications and can contribute to remove the legal obstacles to use of electronic communications exchanged under other int'l conventions.
But in the view of point from article 1, 19, 20, the convention give an excessively broad scope of application, which was unusual in int'l trade related instruments. So participation of the convention from a number of state might not be expected in consideration of strong disagreeing of singapore, Canada, France, China regarding to, in particularly, form requirements.
When the parties trade with the country, in particularly, like a Russia, they can meet its form requirement through the principle of party autonomy and then have to seek their own safety in the facilitation of convention because it was submitted that unrestricted party autonomy could undermine the entire convention and could permit parties to derogate from mandatory national laws.
The electronic convention definitely is a stand-alone instrument but when it is used in connection with the UNCITRAL instruments listed in article 20, paragraph 1, as far as electronic communications exchanged under the existing int'l conventions, it can do duty as, for example, e-CISG but if its use separates from them, it can not be maintained relationship with them like as relationship between e-UCP and UCP.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 유엔전자협약의 주요규정의 개요
- Ⅲ. 유엔전자협약의 실무적용상의 유의점
- Ⅳ. 결론
- 참고문헌
- 〈Abstract〉
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-019544959
