인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.12
- 수록면
- 307 - 323 (17page)
- DOI
- 10.18284/jss.2012.06.31.1.307
이용수
초록· 키워드
In Korea, recently the increase in welfare benefits is the most important social issue. At the General Election in April, all the political parties proposed their welfare programs. Their generous programs need enormous amount of money. How can the government finance the money? The increase in taxes is not easy and unpopular. So political parties did not mention about it.
The discipline of public finance is very important, especially when welfare spending increases. And the increase in welfare spending should not impair the economic growth.
In this perspective, the distributive justice of Henry George and John Rawls is worth being studied comparatively, because both of them have influenced the policies and intellectuals in Korea much.
George insisted that the land should not be the private property, and belong to the community and its best way is the land value taxation(LVT). LVT means the 100% taxation on all the land rent.
I compared the LVT and the principles of justice of Rawls, that is, principles of liberty, the equality of opportunity, and difference. The result is that LVT cannot resolve the problems of poverty and economic inequality satisfactorily, therefore it is insufficient principle of justice. The principle of justice of Rawls is more comprehensive, and that of George is more special. Both principles of justice can be compatible and harmonious to promote the welfare system in Korea.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지The discipline of public finance is very important, especially when welfare spending increases. And the increase in welfare spending should not impair the economic growth.
In this perspective, the distributive justice of Henry George and John Rawls is worth being studied comparatively, because both of them have influenced the policies and intellectuals in Korea much.
George insisted that the land should not be the private property, and belong to the community and its best way is the land value taxation(LVT). LVT means the 100% taxation on all the land rent.
I compared the LVT and the principles of justice of Rawls, that is, principles of liberty, the equality of opportunity, and difference. The result is that LVT cannot resolve the problems of poverty and economic inequality satisfactorily, therefore it is insufficient principle of justice. The principle of justice of Rawls is more comprehensive, and that of George is more special. Both principles of justice can be compatible and harmonious to promote the welfare system in Korea.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 헨리 조지의 정의론
- Ⅲ. 롤스의 정의론
- Ⅳ. 조지의 정의론과 롤스의 정의론 비교
- Ⅴ. 결론
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-300-003014337
