인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.6
- 수록면
- 23 - 60 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.18284/jss.2016.06.35.1.23
이용수
초록· 키워드
This paper discusses how important it is to quantitatively measure the severity of the damage caused by a serious natural disaster, and the state of restoration and reconstruction after the devastation has occurred. Efforts for quantitatively understanding the state of restoration were not observed in the government sector, even after the Great East Japan Earthquake had occurred. A private research institute established its indices measuring the state of restoration, but there was no visible evidence that government agencies had utilised them for policymaking or for policy assessment.
Promptly revising the checklist of statistics that look at the major concerns of disaster victims is necessary as restoration proceeds and government policy delivery becomes more focused on the reconstruction of cities. This paper presents a possible direction for the revision of existing methods of measurement. Three strategies for improvement of the government’s policymaking methods can be identified. (1) A new index suitable for measuring the state of reconstruction at a prefectural level will need to be created in the current stage. (2) A government policy framework for utilising the index should be systematically established as a practice of the EBP. (3) The government should make a business continuation plan for statistical work, and develop guidelines for the treatment and generation of necessary statistics before the next severe disaster occurs, to ensure that the provision of data is therefore rapid and smooth.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지Promptly revising the checklist of statistics that look at the major concerns of disaster victims is necessary as restoration proceeds and government policy delivery becomes more focused on the reconstruction of cities. This paper presents a possible direction for the revision of existing methods of measurement. Three strategies for improvement of the government’s policymaking methods can be identified. (1) A new index suitable for measuring the state of reconstruction at a prefectural level will need to be created in the current stage. (2) A government policy framework for utilising the index should be systematically established as a practice of the EBP. (3) The government should make a business continuation plan for statistical work, and develop guidelines for the treatment and generation of necessary statistics before the next severe disaster occurs, to ensure that the provision of data is therefore rapid and smooth.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Importance of evidence-based policymaking for restoration and reconstruction following a disaster
- 3. Efforts undertaken to understand the extent of damage and state of restoration and reconstruction following the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011
- 4. The importance of timely revision of the Indices and associated constraints
- 5. Remaining constraints
- 6. Conclusion
- References
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-306-000847649
