인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2026.6
- 수록면
- 490 - 503 (14page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Food literacy (FL) and food security are key factors influencing healthy eating and dietary diversity. This study examined whether FL moderates the relationship between food security and dietary diversity score (DDS) among adults in Seoul.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2021–2023 Seoul Food Survey and included 8,248 adults aged 18–64 yrs. The DDS was calculated based on daily intake from 5 food groups (0–5 points). Food security was classified as secure or insecure. FL was assessed using a 33-item scale across nutritional and safety, cultural and relational, and socioecological domains. Participants were grouped into three FL levels. χ² tests, t-tests, analysis of variance, and logistic regression were performed.
RESULTS: Food-secure participants had significantly higher DDS (2.47 vs. 2.22, P < 0.001) and FL scores (64.03 vs. 60.85, P < 0.001), including all subdomains. The DDS gap between the secure and insecure groups was the largest among those with low FL (2.32 vs. 1.74, P < 0.001), narrowing with higher FL. In contrast, among adults with high FL, the food- insecure group showed a higher DDS than the food-secure group. A significant interaction was found between FL and food security on DDS ( P for interaction < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the highest FL group had greater odds of high DDS (odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.84–2.43; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: FL moderates the relationship between food security and dietary diversity, with this association varying across FL levels. FL education may improve diet quality, particularly in food-insecure populations.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지SUBJECTS/METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2021–2023 Seoul Food Survey and included 8,248 adults aged 18–64 yrs. The DDS was calculated based on daily intake from 5 food groups (0–5 points). Food security was classified as secure or insecure. FL was assessed using a 33-item scale across nutritional and safety, cultural and relational, and socioecological domains. Participants were grouped into three FL levels. χ² tests, t-tests, analysis of variance, and logistic regression were performed.
RESULTS: Food-secure participants had significantly higher DDS (2.47 vs. 2.22, P < 0.001) and FL scores (64.03 vs. 60.85, P < 0.001), including all subdomains. The DDS gap between the secure and insecure groups was the largest among those with low FL (2.32 vs. 1.74, P < 0.001), narrowing with higher FL. In contrast, among adults with high FL, the food- insecure group showed a higher DDS than the food-secure group. A significant interaction was found between FL and food security on DDS ( P for interaction < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the highest FL group had greater odds of high DDS (odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.84–2.43; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: FL moderates the relationship between food security and dietary diversity, with this association varying across FL levels. FL education may improve diet quality, particularly in food-insecure populations.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- ABSTRACT
- INTRODUCTION
- SUBJECTS AND METHODS
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- REFERENCES
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
