인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2025.12
- 수록면
- 23 - 56 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.29324/jewcl.2025.12.74.23
이용수
초록· 키워드
This comparative study examines the bird poetry of Korean poet Oh Se-young and Irish poet Michael Longley, revealing fundamental divergences in their representational strategies and philosophical orientations toward the non-human world. Through close readings of poems written between 1990 and 2020, the analysis demonstrates how Oh’s poetry employs avian imagery within a universalizing aesthetic framework rooted in East Asian philosophical traditions, particularly the Korean literary technique of takyeong, wherein natural objects serve as vehicles for moral instruction. In contrast, Longley’s work insists on radical particularity, treating birds as irreducible individuals whose concrete presence resists abstraction into symbolic systems. The study traces these differences across multiple thematic domains: responses to environmental destruction, relationships between collective and individual, temporal structures, and approaches to death and mourning. Oh’s birds function as emblematic figures conveying eternal truths about cosmic order, offering consolation through recognition of universal patterns. Longley’s birds emerge as specific beings inhabiting particular spatiotemporal contexts, demanding testimonial attention that refuses consolatory abstraction. These divergent poetics reflect not merely aesthetic preferences but distinct ethical stances toward ecological responsibility. While Oh’s universalizing approach risks instrumentalizing nature for pedagogical purposes, it offers powerful consolation through cosmic participation. Longley’s particularizing ethics generates urgent obligation through recognition of absolute loss, yet risks paralysis through overwhelming specificity. The study argues that contemporary eco-poetics must navigate between these positions, developing what might be termed strategic oscillation between scales of attention. This comparative analysis contributes to understanding how cultural worldviews manifest in poetic form and how different representational strategies articulate alternative responses to ecological crisis.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- ABSTRACT
- Ⅰ. Introduction
- Ⅱ. Poetics of Representation—Observation, Being, Time, Sound
- Ⅲ. Poetics of Relationship—Love, Freedom, Transmission
- Ⅳ. Conclusion
- Work Cited
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
