메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(이화여자대학교) (이화여자대학교) (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국체육정책학회 한국체육정책학회지 한국체육정책학회지 제24권 제1호
발행연도
수록면
1 - 23 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

This study compared and analyses the governance of the Korea Football Association (KFA) and the Korea Archery Association (KAA). Both organisations received the highest rating (Category A) in the 2025 Sport Organisation Innovation Evaluation; however, they are perceived quite differently by the media and the general public. In order to examine this discrepancy, six experts - comprising scholars, journalists, and sport governance practitioners- evaluated the two associations using the BIBGIS. The BIBGIS has 60 items in total. These items are divided into seven areas: organisational transparency, reporting transparency, stakeholder representation, democratic procedures, control mechanisms, sport integrity, and solidarity. First, KFA was very strong in organisational transparency. But KAA was relatively better in stakeholder representation. Second, both groups got their lowest scores in the solidarity. Third, KFA actually had higher scores than KAA in five of the seven areas. The only exceptions were stakeholder representation and sport integrity. This result is quite different from the usual news or public opinions that are mostly critical of KFA. Based on the result, KAA should put more official documents and governance infomations on its website. For KFA, they need to bring more diverse people into their decision-making bodies. Also, both organisations must cooperate more with civic groups and NGOs to improve their solidarity. To conclude, good governance is not just about having a formal system inside. It also needs active information sharing and communication that really meets what the media and the public expect. This study is expected to contribute to future discussions on sport governance in Korea and to serve as a foundational reference for the development of governance indicators applicable to nationalsport federations and related institutions.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. Ⅰ. 서론
  2. Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
  3. Ⅲ. 연구 방법
  4. Ⅳ. 연구 결과
  5. Ⅴ. 논의
  6. Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언
  7. 참고문헌
  8. ABSTRACT

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기