인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2026.2
- 수록면
- 111 - 123 (13page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
In South Korea, structural reform of sports policy remained constrained by the elite sport-centered orientation of the Korean Sport & Olympic Committee (KSOC) and the Korean Paralympic Committee (KPC). To address this issue, this study reexamines the legal status of both organizations by focusing on the scope of their rights and obligations within the administrative legal framework. Specifically, it investigates the applicability of the concept of “entrusted private entities for public affairs” (gongmusutaksain) to the KSOC and KPC, analyzes the statutory basis and policy implications of such designation, and compares this framework with their current status as special corporations in order to suggest future governance directions.
The findings are as follows. First, an entrusted private entity for public affairs refers to a private individual or corporation that, based on explicit statutory authority, is entrusted by the state or a local government to perform public administrative functions. The requirements for such designation include: (1) the existence of clear statutory authorization, (2) the public and administrative nature of the entrusted duties, (3) the capacity to exercise authority as an administrative actor, and (4) the assumption of administrative legal responsibility. Second, an examination of the National Sports Promotion Act and the Administrative Procedures Act indicates that both the KSOC and KPC satisfy these criteria. The anticipated policy effects include: (1) clarification of administrative authority and enhancement of legal stability, (2) strengthened accountability and transparency, (3) improved efficiency in policy implementation, and (4) enhanced cooperative governance between the state and civil society. Third, as a future development strategy, the study proposes a “hybrid system.” Specific policy recommendations include revising the National Sports Promotion Act, establishing detailed regulations and operational guidelines to reduce legal ambiguity, ensuring organizational autonomy in non-core functions, and creating a permanent consultative body between the government and the two organizations.
The findings are as follows. First, an entrusted private entity for public affairs refers to a private individual or corporation that, based on explicit statutory authority, is entrusted by the state or a local government to perform public administrative functions. The requirements for such designation include: (1) the existence of clear statutory authorization, (2) the public and administrative nature of the entrusted duties, (3) the capacity to exercise authority as an administrative actor, and (4) the assumption of administrative legal responsibility. Second, an examination of the National Sports Promotion Act and the Administrative Procedures Act indicates that both the KSOC and KPC satisfy these criteria. The anticipated policy effects include: (1) clarification of administrative authority and enhancement of legal stability, (2) strengthened accountability and transparency, (3) improved efficiency in policy implementation, and (4) enhanced cooperative governance between the state and civil society. Third, as a future development strategy, the study proposes a “hybrid system.” Specific policy recommendations include revising the National Sports Promotion Act, establishing detailed regulations and operational guidelines to reduce legal ambiguity, ensuring organizational autonomy in non-core functions, and creating a permanent consultative body between the government and the two organizations.
#대한체육회
#대한장애인체육회
#특수법인
#공무수탁사인
#스포츠정책
#Korean Sport & Olympic Committee(KSOC)
#Korean Paralympic Committee(KPC)
#Public delegated public authority
#Special Corporation
#Legal Status
#Sports Policy
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 공무수탁사인의 법률적 정의
- Ⅲ. 대한체육회 및 대한장애인체육회의 공무수탁사인 적용 여부 및 정책적 효과
- Ⅳ. 대한체육회 및 대한장애인체육회의 특수법인 지위와의 비교
- Ⅴ. 대한체육회 및 대한장애인체육회의 법률적 지위의 방향성 및 정책적 방안
- 참고문헌
- ABSTRACT
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
