인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2026.5
- 수록면
- 12 - 50 (39page)
- DOI
- 10.38080/crh.2026.05.155.12
이용수
초록· 키워드
This article examines Armin Mohler’s politics of history as a form of metapolitics in postwar West Germany. Through The Conservative Revolution in Germany 1918–1932, Mohler reconstructed the radical anti-democratic traditions of the Weimar Right as a distinct intellectual genealogy under the name of the “Conservative Revolution.” This project did not openly defend National Socialism, but it sought to make right-wing traditions overshadowed by Nazism usable again for the postwar German Right. In this sense, Mohler’s work constituted a politics of history that attempted to rehabilitate a right-wing intellectual heritage in a seemingly denazified form.
From the mid-1960s onward, Mohler’s critique of Vergangenheitsbewältigung further radicalized this project. Rather than directly denying the Holocaust or Nazi crimes, he attacked the way their memory functioned as a moral boundary that constrained German national self-affirmation and political self-understanding. In Was die Deutschen fürchten and Vergangenheitsbewältigung, coming to terms with the past was reinterpreted not as the ethical foundation of democracy, but as a mechanism of power that reproduced German anxiety and restricted political self-assertion.
The article also analyzes how Mohler institutionalized this politics of history through the Carl Friedrich von Siemens Foundation. The lecture series Die Deutsche Neurose and Ernst Nolte’s 1980 lecture at the foundation translated Mohler’s critique of memory culture into the language of academic debate and bourgeois intellectual culture. Finally, the article traces the later transformation of Mohler’s historical politics through the German New Right, especially Götz Kubitschek and Karlheinz Weißmann, and into the memory politics of the radical wing of the Alternative für Deutschland. This should not be understood as a linear genealogy from Mohler to the AfD. Rather, it was a process of mediation and transformation from metapolitics to mass politics. Mohler’s politics of history was not a strategy for directly seizing power, but a long-term struggle over what could be remembered, what could be said, and what kind of Germanness could once again be asserted in postwar Germany.
From the mid-1960s onward, Mohler’s critique of Vergangenheitsbewältigung further radicalized this project. Rather than directly denying the Holocaust or Nazi crimes, he attacked the way their memory functioned as a moral boundary that constrained German national self-affirmation and political self-understanding. In Was die Deutschen fürchten and Vergangenheitsbewältigung, coming to terms with the past was reinterpreted not as the ethical foundation of democracy, but as a mechanism of power that reproduced German anxiety and restricted political self-assertion.
The article also analyzes how Mohler institutionalized this politics of history through the Carl Friedrich von Siemens Foundation. The lecture series Die Deutsche Neurose and Ernst Nolte’s 1980 lecture at the foundation translated Mohler’s critique of memory culture into the language of academic debate and bourgeois intellectual culture. Finally, the article traces the later transformation of Mohler’s historical politics through the German New Right, especially Götz Kubitschek and Karlheinz Weißmann, and into the memory politics of the radical wing of the Alternative für Deutschland. This should not be understood as a linear genealogy from Mohler to the AfD. Rather, it was a process of mediation and transformation from metapolitics to mass politics. Mohler’s politics of history was not a strategy for directly seizing power, but a long-term struggle over what could be remembered, what could be said, and what kind of Germanness could once again be asserted in postwar Germany.
#Armin Mohler
#Conservative Revolution
#metapolitics
#politics of history
#Vergangenheitsbewältigung
#Carl Friedrich von Siemens Foundation
#German New Right
#Alternative für Deutschland
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 몰러의 메타적 역사정치
- 2. 보수혁명론과 우파적 탈나치화의 역사정치
- 3. 불안의 역사정치: 『독일인들은 무엇을 두려워하는가』에서 『과거청산―정화에서 조작으로』까지
- 4. 지멘스 재단의 학술정치와 역사정치
- 5. 메타정치에서 대중정치로 : 뉴라이트와 독일 대안당의 역사정치
- 참고문헌
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
