메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(동북아역사재단)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2026년 여름호(통권 제155호)
발행연도
수록면
107 - 128 (22page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2026.05.155.107

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

Civilizationism emerged as non-Western nations in Eurasia sought to define their identities in order to resist the spread of liberal democratic ideals following the end of the Cold War. A “civilizational state” refers to a nation that adopts civilizationism as its core ideology. Representative examples of such states include Russia, China, Türkiye, and India. Initially, these nations adopted a defensive posture; however, as the U.S.-centered unipolar order has begun to waver and the international standing of non-Western nations, including China, has risen, they have shifted to an offensive stance. In 2023, China designated its version of civilizationalism as “Xivilization(Xi Jinping Civilization).” Xivilization is characterized by a Confucian-socialist civilizational model and the concept of “Tianxia.” Domestically, the Chinese Communist Party has utilized the Confucian-Socialist civilization model to attempt the indigenization of Marxism, which originated in the Soviet Union. Externally, “Tianxia” has been proposed as an alternative order to replace the liberal international order. Through historical statecraft that leverages history, the Chinese Communist Party has sought to position itself not only as the guardian and inheritor of Chinese civilization but also as the rightful steward responsible for the future of both China and the world. China’s historical statecraft has the following shortcomings. One is the dogma of history, which carries the risk of making the Chinese people prisoners of history. Another is the selective use of history. China is utilizing selective memory and a reconstructed version of history to claim its rightful place in the international community. Civilizationism is a more dangerous ideology than nationalism; just as nationalism has been scrutinized, civilizationism must be monitored with even greater intensity.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. 1. 서론: 문명이 돌아왔다
  2. 2. 문명국가 중국의 시진핑 문명(Xivilazation)
  3. 3. 유교가 공산주의를 삼키다
  4. 4. 역사의 귀환: 과거를 활용해 미래를 만들기
  5. 5. 결론: 역사는 종신형과 같다
  6. 참고문헌

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기