인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2026.05
- 수록면
- 240 - 273 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.38080/crh.2026.05.155.240
이용수
초록· 키워드
This article examines the transformations that occurred during the reception of Western modern historiography outside of the West. Academic History dominated historiography in modern East Asia. The formation process of Academic History can be said to be a process in which modern Japanese historians fused National Learning(國學) and Ranke’s methodology. Suematsu Yasukazu(末松保和), one of Japan’s leading Academic Historians of the twentieth century, wrote Mimana History(任那興亡史). This work adhered to prewar Academic History and was rooted in Managing Korea theory(南鮮經營說) seen from the perspective of Japanese history in 1949. Suematsu’s basic idea manifested in Mimana History was not fundamentally different from that of Kuroita Katsumi(黑板勝美), showing how he was still under the spell of Kuroita and his colonialist historiography as “contemporary common idea.” In modern Japan, Academic History was a combination of colonialism-added academic methodology and transformed Western modern historiography.
#Academic History
#Colonialist Historiography
#Suematsu Yasukazu(末松保和)
#Mimana Nihon-fu(任那日本府)
#Managing Korea theory(南鮮經營說)
#Kuroita Katsumi(黑板勝美)
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 머리말
- 2. 근대 일본의 아카데미즘 역사학과 스에마츠
- 3. 『임나흥망사』의 집필과 스에마츠의 지적 네트워크
- 4. 맺음말
- 참고문헌