인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2026.5
- 수록면
- 274 - 303 (30page)
- DOI
- 10.38080/crh.2026.05.155.274
이용수
초록· 키워드
When the past recedes further into distance, the future becomes increasingly difficult to anticipate, and the present is fraught with contradictions, questions concerning the very significance of historical inquiry persist. Historiography that is detached from realities or fails to engage with the broader public may face the prospect of academic decline. Under such conditions, the concerns of scholars specializing in premodern history, including the Joseon dynasty, inevitably deepen. This trend is closely related to the diminishing interest in premodern history, as well as to the growing influence of artificial intelligence, which renders research centered merely on the straightforward interpretation of historical data increasingly obsolete. Accordingly, research on the Joseon dynasty, as part of premodern history, can secure its sustainability only by moving beyond the mere accumulation of knowledge and by engaging with its present meaning. One possible approach lies in strengthening the public dimension of historical studies, extending beyond simple popularization. From an academic standpoint, this entails not only elucidating the distinctive operating principles of Joseon society―such as the nobi system―but also paying close attention to the processes through which its internal contradictions were overcome. Such an approach begins by defamiliarizing conventional assumptions and analytical frameworks, including those centered on development, continuity, and stagnation. Even in the present, when the transformative era that once envisioned an ideal future has receded, a perspective that emphasizes the resolution of inherent contradictions within history remains valid. The formation and overcoming of contradictions in everyday life, and structural changes that appear in the process, continue to constitute important areas of inquiry, both in the past and in the present.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 한국사 연구와 현실의 조응
- 2. 발전과 지속, 모순의 극복
- 3. 현재성의 오류, 조선의 노비제
- 4. 마무리, 새로운 모색
- 참고문헌
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
