인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Predicting submarine motion during emergency rising requires accurate estimation of the moments of inertia during ballast tank blowing, yet prior studies approximate tanks as simple cubes or cylinders that may not reflect real mass distributions. This study develops a voxelization framework that computes moments of inertia directly from computer-aided design geometry without simplification. Three tanks of identical volume and mass (cube, cylinder, and U-shaped) were analyzed under stepwise blowing (100–40% mass) and pitch rotation (0–30 degrees), and the resulting inertia was coupled with the hull inertia. At full mass, the U-shaped tank showed 113.3% and 50.0% higher roll-axis inertia (I<sub>xx</sub>) than the cube and cylinder, respectively. I<sub>xx</sub> decreased by 55–57% as mass fell to 40%, with a further 9–11% reduction under a 30-degree pitch rotation for the cylinder and U-shaped tanks but none for the cube. When coupled with the hull inertia, the geometry-induced difference in total inertia remained within 3.3% for the roll axis and below 0.1% for the pitch and yaw axes, for which the position inertia term dominates. Tank geometry therefore strongly affects tank self-inertia but influences overall submarine inertia only in roll motion, governed by I<sub>xx</sub>. The proposed approach offers an efficient tool for evaluating simplified ballast tank models.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
