인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This study aims to reexamine the historical context of UN General Assembly Resolution 195 (III), adopted on December 12, 1948, and, on this basis, propose desirable writing directions along with a specific textbook drafting example for high school Korean history textbooks.
Historically, textbook writing guidelines have focused predominantly on securing the legitimacy of the Government of the Republic of Korea, portraying the UN’s intervention and Paragraph 2 of Resolution 195 (III) primarily as an event in which South Korea was recognized as the “only lawful government in Korea.” However, an accurate translation of the text renders it as the “only lawful government on the Korean peninsula,” implying that while the South Korean government—unlike the North Korea goverment—underwent the procedure of elections under UN observation, its effective jurisdiction was confined to South Korea. Furthermore, an analysis of key resolutions and their associated debates—including UN General Assembly Resolution 112 (II), the Interim Committee resolution on the Korean problem, Resolution 195 (III), and Resolution 376 (V)—reveals that the UN’s involvement in the Korean question was not primarily focused on granting legitimacy to the South Korean government. Instead, the UN placed paramount importance on the pursuit of Korean unification and the establishment of a unified government based on representativeness of the Korean people, both South and North.
Accordingly, this study analyzes the current narratives of high school Korean history textbooks under the 2022 Revised National Curriculum and presents textbook writing directions and a specific drafting example. The textbook example proposed in this study will help learners understand the overall objectives and approaches of the United Nations regarding the Korean question.
Historically, textbook writing guidelines have focused predominantly on securing the legitimacy of the Government of the Republic of Korea, portraying the UN’s intervention and Paragraph 2 of Resolution 195 (III) primarily as an event in which South Korea was recognized as the “only lawful government in Korea.” However, an accurate translation of the text renders it as the “only lawful government on the Korean peninsula,” implying that while the South Korean government—unlike the North Korea goverment—underwent the procedure of elections under UN observation, its effective jurisdiction was confined to South Korea. Furthermore, an analysis of key resolutions and their associated debates—including UN General Assembly Resolution 112 (II), the Interim Committee resolution on the Korean problem, Resolution 195 (III), and Resolution 376 (V)—reveals that the UN’s involvement in the Korean question was not primarily focused on granting legitimacy to the South Korean government. Instead, the UN placed paramount importance on the pursuit of Korean unification and the establishment of a unified government based on representativeness of the Korean people, both South and North.
Accordingly, this study analyzes the current narratives of high school Korean history textbooks under the 2022 Revised National Curriculum and presents textbook writing directions and a specific drafting example. The textbook example proposed in this study will help learners understand the overall objectives and approaches of the United Nations regarding the Korean question.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
