인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Modern trends in water management are more than ever inclined towards ecological solutions to avoid technical stream-channel regulation of riverbeds in the design of flood defence measures. Modifications to straighten the riverbeds that were considered in the past, removed the natural meanders of the river, increased the longitudinal slope of the riverbed, and accelerated the outflow from the threatened area. The goals of building protective dams and controlled floodplains are also limited by the negative perception of conservationists and ecologists, which leads to stagnation and discouragement from the proposals. The aim of this article is to compare the given perception of ecological aspects in different countries, how they approach them and how they are applied in studies of flood solutions. Among the ecological aspects, the following points of view will be observed: (1) options for regulation and design of flood areas, (2) duration of flooding time for the ecosystem or the landscape, (3) redefinition of riverfront in cities and (4) concept of resilience.
#Flood myth
#Threatened species
#Floodplain
#Flooding (psychology)
#Perception
#Environmental resource management
#Geography
#River management
#River ecosystem
#Psychological resilience
#Resilience (materials science)
#Natural (archaeology)
#Ecology
#Ecosystem
#Environmental science
#Habitat
#Cartography
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.